October 12th 2004
Nick Baker's fifth appeal hearing was held today in
room 718 of the Tokyo High Court in Kasumigaseki. Today's session focused
upon Nick's principle lawyer Shunji Miyake's questioning of Customs
Official Kawashima, who headed up the initial investigation when Nick and
Mr. A first arrived at Narita Airport on April 13, 2002.
Baker, wearing silver wire-rimmed spectacles and dressed in a light green
shirt and gray suit, appeared thin and somewhat pale. The date marked
almost exactly two and a half years to the day that Baker has spent in
detention, mostly in solitary confinement. Defying the worst typhoon
Japan had experienced in more than a decade, some 20 of Baker's Japanese
supporters sat in the public gallery. The proceedings lasted two hours.
First, the Prosecutor spent some 10 minutes reviewing Kawashima's
photographing of seized articles in the customs inspection area, to which
Kawashima offered a n umber of corrections and apologies.
Next, as the three judges followed documents and took notes, Miyake
proceeded with the cross-examination. There were many specific questions
asked, regarding when and where the various inspections took place, who
was involved and what articles were found where.
One might think that Kawashima would have the details of that day etched
deeply in his memory, as it might be considered a sort of Holy Grail for
a customs official -- the largest-ever carry-through estasy seizure at
Japan's largest airport, a bust he was personally in charge of and for
which he wrote and signed the confiscation report. But for almost every
question Miyake asked, Kawashima's answer was the same.
"I don't remember."
Asked what other officers or officials were present during the
inspection, Kawashima replied, "I don't remember."
When asked if personal effects from Baker's waist pouch had been mixed in
afterward w ith items in the suitcase, Kawashima replied, "I don't remember."
In an apparent contradiction with previous testimony, when asked if the
key for the suitcase was found in Baker's pocket or in the suitcase
itself, or if he had any recollection of the confiscation of the suitcase
key, Kawashima again replied, "I don't remember."
When asked about the confiscation report, which he was responsible for
and signed but which was apparently written on at least two different
computers and had different fonts and page layout, Kasahara suggested
that an accident might have caused the pages to move during photocopying,
or that there had been mistyping. When pressed on the point, he said it
that "maybe" he had signed the confiscation report before it was
completed, that is, it was possible information had been added, deleted
or edited after he affixed his personal seal and signature.
When shown the official document in question and asked why his signature
was written in pencil, Kasahara replied, "I don't remember." Asked if the
document had in fact been completed not on April 13 as indicated, but at
some later date, Kasahara quickly rejected the suggestion. "That's not
true" he said.
In the last ten minutes of the hearing, Judge Toa directly questioned
Kawashima, who had previously testified that he "or perhaps someone else"
took the Polaroid photographs of the confiscated items. Today, Toa wanted
clarification. Kawashima said that there were six people present, and
that it was "maybe possible" that he himself had taken the pictures, or
maybe he had taken some of them. When asked if any other parties had
contacted him in any way regarding his preparation of the confiscation
report, Kawashima replied, "I don't remember."
In total, Kawashima said "I don't remember" 46 times while on the witness
stand today.
After dismissing the witness, Judge Toa set a sixth appeal heari ng, of 90
minutes, from 2:30 pm on December 7th. Court was adjourned until that time.